Agents of untruth
AT no other time in the history of newspaper publishing in this country
is the need on the part of the reader to read them with critical
detachment more pronounced than today.
This is on account of the misleading information,
deliberate distortions, omissions and lies being brazenly foist on the
reader by some sections of the privately - owned media, who continue to
claim that they are "free".
On Sunday - the Sunday Times really took the cake when
it carried absolutely inaccurate, misleading and distorted reports,
obviously to devalue the Government.
The first was their lead story which in a blazing
headline stated 'WB giving Rs. 6b to Tiger areas - Country Director
insists the LTTE a stakeholder'. Reacting strongly to this false report
WB Country Director Peter Harrold issued a statement contradicting the
report, which we carry today as our front page lead story, which
explains it all.
On the same day the Sunday Times attempted to mislead
the public on a recruitment of graduate trainees by the State to the
education sector, apparently, in their haste to damn and denigrate the
State.
These newspapers are hardly caring to check on the full
factual accuracy of their news reports: a cardinal principle in
responsible journalism. This is probably how private ownership of
newspapers leads to the "freedom of the wild ass".
A trend in these newspapers, for some time now, has been
to darken and discredit important State officials, such as Education
Ministry Secretary Dr. Tara de Mel, who are shouldering the onerous
responsibility of setting things right in this country's State sector
and giving to the people their due.
When Dr. de Mel resigned from the position of CNO chief,
she followed it up with a detailed and clear explanation of the reasons
which led to her decision, which was aired on the CNO Website, although
speculative, misleading accounts of her decision appeared in some
privately - owned sections of the press.
These tendencies place a huge question mark over the
reliability, factual accuracy and integrity of these sections of the
media.
Despite extravagant claims to neutrality and
impartiality, these sections of the media are very much part of the
power game and are mere pawns of partisan political interests. For,
there is no better way to tarnish the image of the President than to
project her officials in an unfavourable light.
It is anybody's guess as to what the policies of these
newspapers are. Are they for ending this country's conflict and
rebuilding it on the principles of equality and unity or have they
fallen prey to the parasitic interests which are keen on keeping Lanka
in a whirlpool of tensions and uncertainties? Are they for a just peace
or a wasting, destructive war? These questions are hard to answer.
The treatment of some current issues in these
newspapers, clearly supports the position that these sections of the
media are on the side of untruth and lies. Take the case of a suitable
administrative mechanism for the North-East which would facilitate the
process of bringing relief to the population of the region.
It has been the aim of these sections to equate this
administrative mechanism with the controversial ISGA, although they are
clearly not synonymous.
The idea apparently is to keep the country on the boil
while the President is exerting herself to the utmost to bring peace on
an equitable basis. Don't these sections of the media need peace and
happiness? On what are their hearts and minds focused?
This mindset is most difficult to fathom. While
constructive criticism of Government policy is welcome destructive
criticism of this kind would only lead Sri Lanka along the path of
national ruin. |