What's the value of friendship?
by Lucy Rock, Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004
Philosophers and poets have long pondered the importance of
friendship: Euripides thought "a loyal friend worth 10,000 relatives,"
while Ringo got by with a little help from his.
With marriage in terminal decline in many nations, many of us are
realising the value of ours. In the United Kingdom for instance, within
25 years half of those aged 45 to 54 will not be married (compared with
just over 70 per cent who are in a marriage today).
For the increasing number who remain single or childless, friends are
the new families - a trend reflected in TV series such as Friends and
Will & Grace.
But juggling friends and work is not easy. Take my week: Saturday
night was spent with neighbours, drinking, eating and gossiping; Sunday
I met Dawn, a former colleague from three jobs ago, for lunchtime Bloody
Marys; on Monday I was kickboxing with Sally, whom I met on holiday 10
years ago; on Tuesday I went to Guys and Dolls with school-friend
Rachel; Wednesday is pub quiz night with a bunch of hacks (we never
win); on Thursday I had dinner with old university friends.
By Friday I was exhausted and broke, and spent the evening slumped on
the sofa wondering if I had the money, time or stamina to keep up with
everyone.
I love my friends and am grateful they've stuck by me all these
years. But the older I get, and the more people I befriend, the more
difficult it is to keep up with them. And I'm not alone.
Economic significance ignored
As more of us go to university, hop between jobs, move around the
country and marry later, we build up large, varied networks. And yet,
for all their increasing importance in our lives and the high cost of
maintaining friendships, we have no idea of the economic significance of
friends.
Thanks to economists and sociologists, policy-makers know almost
everything there is to know about marriage and the family, and its
impact on health and national wellbeing. Employers, too, can turn to any
number of studies about how husbands, wives and children affect
workplace performance.
Yet important economic questions about friendship remain unstudied
and unanswered. Is there an optimum number of friends? Does having
friends affect health and productivity? Is friendship the same for men
and women?
John Ermisch, professor of economics at the Institute for Social and
Economic Research at Essex University, England, also believes it worth
studying, but is sceptical about whether friends play a more important
role now: "It may be true for younger people, partly because of delaying
family-related events such as babies and marriage.
"It's a life cycle thing. By middle age, family are important again,
especially if you have children. Things like having a baby reduces the
amount of time you see friends regularly.
"To a lesser extent a partnership does as well. The other thing that
happens over a life cycle is that friends are substituted for other
friends ... those with children make friends with other mothers." Prof.
Ermisch has been looking, as part of a wider study on mobility, at how
friendship networks affect people's decision to move house.
"If you have a large and dense friendship network this reduces the
chance that you will move more than 30km away.
You find that after people have moved, old friendship networks are
dropped." Interestingly, he has found that those who move once are more
likely to move again because they have fewer friendship ties.
Proper regard for the economics of friendship could influence all
sorts of areas: employers might find that encouraging workplace social
clubs increases productivity and makes workers less likely to leave
companies which give priority when allocating Christmas holiday leave to
employees with families may realise single people have 'families' of
friends they are just as close to and people could be allowed
compassionate leave if a best friend was terminally ill.
And friends we've neglected would understand it's not because we
don't like them any more it's just the income and substitution effect. |