Court gives go ahead for cluster polling booths
by Wasantha Ramanayake
The Supreme Court after considering two fundamental rights
applications yesterday issued an interim order permitting to hold the
Presidential Election for voters of LTTE controlled areas in the cluster
polling stations.
In terms of the order, the election is to be held subject to ten fold
safeguards proposed by the Commissioner and modified by the court having
heard the submissions by counsel. The Bench comprised Chief Justice
Sarath N. Silva PC and Justices Nihal Jayasinghe and Nimal Gamini
Amaratunga.
The court upholding the contention of the petitioner's counsel
extended the minimum distance up to 1 km between the "line of control"
and the cluster polling stations.
The counsel argued that the minimum distance of 500 m as proposed by
the Commissioner was not enough to canvass the support of the voters
since such canvassing within the distances of 500 m from the polling
stations was prohibited.
The counsel submitted that since they were not allowed to canvass in
the LTTE held areas, they need the opportunity for some canvassing at
least on the election date.
The Court also held that if a person with an official poll card and
without any means of identifications was challenged or relevant election
officials had suspicions, the official should question such person to
enure that he\she was not impersonating. The petitioners submitted that
in the previous election bundles of poll cards had been distributed
among the persons who had come to vote and contended that voters should
have a valid form of identity.
The court observed that in the absence of the regular postal service
in the LTTE held areas, that there was no guarantee the person who was
in possession of the poll card was in fact the registered voter.
The Court observed that President's counsel K.N. Choksy for
Intervenient petitioner UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe submitted that
there should be no requirement for a person to identify himself when a
poll card was produced. He submitted that even if there was any doubt as
to the identity of such a person, he should be given a ballot on making
a declaration in terms of the election law.
The court observed that the counsel for the petitioners contended
that the such declaration would not serve any purpose since the person
would return to the LTTE controlled areas and would not be subject to
any applicable law.
The Court also held with the contention of the petitioners that
transport should be provided from LTTE controlled areas to the Line of
Control and there upto cluster polling stations which would give an
opportunity for canvassing.
The court observed that the ten fold safeguards would introduce a
degree of artificiality to the electoral process.
"The procedure contains elements of robotic exercise far removed from
the freedom and vibrancy of a democratic election. However, it was
necessary to introduce these safeguards to ensure a free exercise of
franchise within the framework of the prevalent conditions."
Sri Lanka Progressive Front presidential candidate Peter Nelson
Perera and Leader of the Sri Lanka National Front, Presidential
candidate Wimal Geeganage filed rights petitions complaining that there
was an imminent infringement to their rights as the Election
Commissioner Dayananda Dissanayake was taking steps to establish polling
stations in LTTE controlled areas.
The petitioners cited Election Commissioner Dayananda Dissanayake,
IGP Chandra Fernando, Army Commander Shantha Kottegoda and the Attorney
General as the respondents. President's Counsel D.S. Wijesinghe and
Wijedasa Rajapakse with S. Wijewardene appeared for Peter Nelson
Perera.Manohara de Silva with W.D. Weeraratne and Udaya Gammanpila
appeared for Wimal Geeganage.Deputy Solicitor General Shavindra Fernando
appeared for the Commissioner.
President's Counsel K.N. Choksy with Daya Pelpola and Roland Perera
appeared for UNP leader Ranil Wickremasinghe.Sanjeewa Jayawardane
appeared for PAFFREL and Centre for Monitoring Election Violence.
M.A. Sumanthiran with Viran Corea appeared for Centre for Policy
alternatives.
Attorney-at-Law W.D. Weeraratne filed a petition for the Presidential
Candidate. |