UNICEF and child soldiers
The United Nations Children?s Fund
(UNICEF), the universal guardian of children?s rights and the
international voice against child exploitation, has come out strongly
against last week?s press publications depicting two LTTE child soldiers
who had decamped from a Tiger training facility and sought refuge with
the army.
Issuing a media bulletin it has also gone one step further and
deigned to set out ?Principles and guidelines for ethical reporting on
Children and the Young People? to the local media and has taken upon
itself to set out certain ?dos? and ?don?ts? when disseminating material
about LTTE child conscripts.
We are certainly with the UNICEF in their umbrage if the media has
crossed the line in this connection. But what cannot be comprehended by
the discerning public is what steps this great defender of the rights of
the child has taken to rein in the perpetrators. Certainly in this
instance the UNICEF has missed the woods for the trees. What has this
vast mega-billion dollar funded world body done during the two decade
old ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka to address the issue of child soldiers?
Being in the position where its voice is heard and taken note of, has
the UNICEF succeeded in even causing any impact on the LTTE to give up
on this horrendous exercise where children are plucked away from their
parents in the first bloom of their youth? One recalls the visit of UN
Special Rapporteur on Children Olara Otunu visiting the Wanni not so
long ago where a pledge was extracted from the LTTE to halt recruiting
under-aged children into its fighting units.
But the moment his back was turned on them the LTTE went about its
usual business of child conscription. We don?t recall the UNICEF, who
never hesitate to gnash its teeth over any real or imagined infringement
by the Security Forces, making any effort to bring this matter to the
notice of the International Community. Other than compiling statistics
and coming out with lukewarm protests, the UNICEF has singularly failed
so far to rein in the Tigers on the issue of child conscription and
fulfil its mandate.
Nay it has all long being merely paying lip-service on the horrendous
practise of child recruitment which no civilised country would
countenance. The task of a world body such as the UNICEF, concerned with
the welfare and well-being of the world?s child population, should
surely extend beyond words and reports. We don?t here deign to proffer
gratuitous advise to the world body. But there are many avenues through
which it can make its voice heard globally vis-a-vis the plight of
children under the grip of the LTTE.
It can add its voice for a ban on the outfit in specific countries
and could organise demonstrations in world capitals to highlight the
gravity of the problem instead of proffering unsolicited advise to the
local media. Did the UNICEF, whose breast overflows with the milk of
kindness for children, make even a whimper on behalf of the children of
the three Policemen of the National Child Protection Authority captured
by the LTTE?
Now though it has seen fit to lecture the Sri Lankan media for the
?exposure? of the two LTTE children who had fled to safety from their
captors. It is surprising that the UNICEF, which not so long ago
documented the various atrocities against children by the LTTE in
precise detail (1794 forcible conscriptions), has taken up this issue
with such vehemence thereby implicitly siding with the very outfit they
condemn.
It also amounts to a contradiction of its role that acting to protect
children without any form of ambiguity.
Here is an instance where the full horror of child soldiers is being
brought to the public domain for the world to sit back and take note of.
Here is also an opportunity for the UNICEF to take up the issues of
child soldiers with added vigour. Instead it cloaks the whole issue with
an attack on the authorities and the media thus allowing the real issue
of child soldiers go by default.
And this at a time when the LTTE had given an undertaking to cease
all child recruitment into their fighting units at Geneva. Here was an
ideal opportunity for the UNICEF, who often beats its breasts over child
recruitment, to highlight the ordeal of child conscripts and demonstrate
its credentials internationally. But instead it decides to
shoot the messenger. |