|
Pawn broking, earlier confined to the private individuals or concerns
has now become an important activity of the banking sector especially
the State and the indigenous private banks. It has brought in many
welcome changes.
The advances are high, interest is non-usurious and the articles
redeemable and secure to name a few obvious improvements. As long as the
pawnee pays his dues and redeem them as agreed, it is smooth sailing. At
the time of pawning Banks go by the gold contents alone, basing on the
valuation by Central Bank.
All pawnees do not and may not be able to redeem their items. When
the advance becomes overdue banks arrange to dispose of the articles by
auction, after giving sufficient notice to the pawnees in addition to
the publicity in the media and the billboards.
At the time of the auction what was latent at the time of pawning
surfaces as important and enhances the value of the articles. In the
first instance Central Bank valuation is replaced by the market price
which is always higher than the former and there is always sufficient
margin to realize a higher bid. Not only the accepted carat content but
also the embedded stones and the workmanship become relevant.
At the time of the auction banks normally fix an upset price. This
would invariably consist of the amount advanced, interest accrued, up to
date of auction, and another additive as the shared portion of the
expenses incurred directly connected to the auction such as the
advertisement, staff cost and postage incurred.
At the auction every endeavour is made to avoid losses to the bank.
It is a prudent business proposition.
What is lacking is the desire to obtain the maximum price which is
definitely much more than that required to cover banks' dues.
It has to be borne in mind that a genuine pawnee fails to redeem
because of the financial straits or constraints. Pawning is resorted to,
to retain the jewellery in due course and in the meantime use it as a
pledge to obtain the necessary working capital as a small time trader or
farmer, or even a public servant.
Pawning at the time of sowing and redeeming at the time of the
harvest is a common occurrence in our country. Banks are aware of the
seasonal turnover. It may have become unredeemable due to the nonreceipt
of the anticipated income.
Disposal of the articles at the auction to the concerted pressured
bidding by the organised dealers may only help to wipe off the dealings
in books of the banks. It further pauperizes the pawnee.
What was expected is the obtaining of the maximum possible price at
the auction and refund the excess to the hapless pawnee who would be
compensated at least up to the market value less what is due to the bank
by way of the loaning transaction resorted to as a desperate move or as
a temporary move.
It is true to say that it is within the realms of possibility to
obtain the highest price instead of playing into the hands of concerted
underbidding by organised gangs, knowingly or unknowingly aided and
abetted from within or being taken for a ride by the bidding groups.
Safest course is not to part with the articles that fail to fetch
closer to the market price and resort to the alternative of disposal as
'Gold' in the market.
If there is no cooperation from within the participants at the
auction will bid and raise the going price instead of depressing same.
To refund the excess to the hapless pawnee is another duty of the Bank,
if it has to honourably replace the usurious pawnbrokers, the local
shylocks.
R. SUNTHARALINGAM - Urumpirai-West
In my childhood, cartoons, especially, strip cartoons, that were
published in the then Ceylon Daily News and its sister paper the Sunday
Observer fascinated me no end. Sometimes full cartoons pages appeared in
colour, further enhancing my childhood enjoyment.
One of my favourites was Tarzan. I used to collect those strips and
paste them in used exercise books for further subsequent reading (or
mulling?) Although at that time I did not quite understand the English
dialogues in them, my imagination rioted and immensely entertained me as
a child.
Later, after passing my first public exam, the senior school
certificate in 1949, I became more selective of newspaper cartoons and
Tarzan faded away. Still 'Ripley's Believe It or Not', 'Mandrake the
Magician' 'Bringing up Father,' by Geo Mac Manus, 'Dagwood Bumstead,'
'Donald Duck,' 'Gambols', 'Mr. Abernathy,' 'Rip Kirby,' 'Pop-eye with
his inevitable can of spinach the life giver, that appeared in the CDN
and SO, gave me immense reading pleasure while imperceptibly widening my
outlook.
Passing into the only university in Sri Lanka, at the time having
completed the higher school certificate and university entrance exam, my
interest in world class cartoons, brought to as by CDN and SO, continued
unabated. As most of the cartoons come to us through the SO (Sunday
Observer) these cartoons became a pleasurable pastime, enjoyed in
weekend armchair comfort.
As my first job after graduation was as a junior journalist in the 'Dinamina'
Editorial Department, reading my favourite cartoons in CDN and SO,
became a ready facility. Still later, when I entered other fields, I
became a regular buyer of these newspapers and my favourite cartoons
were with me.
In the course of this long association (more than 50 years) there had
been periods in which these cartoons were not published, perhaps due to
non-functioning of world syndicate agreements.
It is therefore very nice to see Daily News bring some of those world
renowned cartoons for the pleasure of its readership. I am convinced
that such service definitely goes to widen the outlook and perspectives
of the readers besides affording them with much needed humour and
enjoyment.
As for me it will somehow contribute to compensate me for the
nostalgic memories of Dagwood, Blondie, Tootsie, and Jiggs, Maggie,
their dog fifi, and their constantly borrowing neighbour, Titus Canby
(pronounced Can Buy, but he never does). The Gambols and their Dawg, and
a host of other endearing characters who were our weekend friends of
yesteryear.
SOMARaThNE EDIRISINGHE
Further to my letter published in the Sunday Observer heard some more
interesting facts on the above subject. Apparently quite a few of these
women are not even Muslims.
They are seen regularly on other days in non-Muslims costumes begging
from house to house and when asked why they would not like to work they
have said that any of them easily earn 500-1000 rupees a Friday at the
mosques and that they're not in need of working.
It's also understood that these women monopolize their positions on
the road outside the mosques. Newcomers are not tolerated or are even
threatened.
Some poor Muslim women have complained that they have been chased
away and had to stand on the main-road to receive any charity.
Not that Islam forbids charity to non-Muslims but this sort of
thuggery, cheating and laziness are certainly not condoned by Islam.
The best solution would be to forbid anyone Muslim or otherwise from
begging outside the mosque but to set up a scheme where anyone who wants
to donate for charity to give it to the mosque trustees who in turn
should take the responsibility to investigate into the actual economic
situation of these so-called beggars and distribute the collected money
appropriately or even better use it to give these women some vocational
training so that they will become self sufficient.
It's time Muslims recognized their responsibility in minimizing
begging which is a shame to the community and also in minimizing
intermingling of the sexes for whatever reason it maybe and that too
just outside the mosque.
Some people must come forward to take the initiative to do something
to change the present abhorrent practice.
DR. MAREENA THAHA REFFAI - Dehiwala
I have paid my telephone bills promptly from the time we had a
telephone installed and never queried even when bills were dubious.
Recently I had paid a bill by cheque. Unfortunately, the cheque had
not been signed. The person who accepted the cheque at the Liberty Plaza
Teleshop should have returned it to the person who presented it.
The person who forwarded the cheque to the bank for clearance didn't
bother either, to return it to me. Neither of them appear to have been
penalised for their carelessness.
On the other hand we have no means of demanding any payment for the
lapses, unless we are ready to go to courts and expend some more money.
You will see how one-sided are the agreements we sign to get a phone.
M. M. N. DE SILVA - Dehiwela |