UNP - translate words into action
THE decision by the United National
Party (UNP) to boycott this week's All Party Meeting called by President
Mahinda Rajapaksa to hammer out a new framework for a solution to the
ethnic problem certainly defies logic.
Nay, it could even be described as an unpatriotic act. As the party
which launched the country into the post-colonial era, the UNP cannot
turn its back on its heritage of leading the first post-Independent
Government.
By the same token as a party whose leaders never tire of proclaiming
it to be the largest political entity in the country, the UNP cannot
abrogate its responsibility by the people.
It is a party that has governed the country for the largest duration
and as a liberal democratic party has always trod the moderate ground,
not given to extremist action. Its leaders, have for the most part being
level-headed individuals, whose service to the public need no
elaboration.
Whatever its critics may say the UNP in the public eye is a moderate
political party amenable to criticism and whose core is represented by
the entrepreneurial class, the landed gentry, the educated elite and
professionals with conservatism underpinning its policies and outlook.
Leaders of the calibre of D. S. Senanayake, Sir John Kotelawala and
Dudley Senanayake was the epitome of this conservatism that was to be
the hallmark of the party where there was always room for compromise.
This common thread of the party ran down the line so much so even
Ranasinghe Premadasa, considered as an 'outsider', spoke on
consultation, compromise and consensus as the panacea for conflict
resolution.
It is in this light that one should view the decision of the present
UNP leader who is widely portrayed as being enlightened and possessed of
a visionary outlook.
To that extent the by-partisan approach the UNP leader Ranil
Wickremesinghe mooted via the Liam Fox agreement when he was Opposition
Leader a decade ago went on to demonstrate his credentials as a leader
who viewed the ethnic issue devoid of party politics.
Hence it is baffling as to why this sudden about-turn on the part of
Wickremesinghe in spurning the offer by the President to explore a new
avenue for a solution at a time the country is at crossroads.
The time has come as never before for all-party unity to defeat the
aim of terrorists who are hell-bent on dividing the country.
With focus of India and the international community now spotlighted
on Sri Lanka, it is incumbent upon the two major political parties to
sit down and work out a structure that would meet the legitimate
aspirations of all communities.
Any signs of a polarisation in the Southern political theatre could
only be manna from heaven to the LTTE, now being cornered by the
international community, and provide it with extra vigour to carry out
its dastardly deeds.
Therefore the UNP as the principal opposition party should act with
more circumspection if not for anything other than the 48 per cent of
voters who supported its leader.
It is also significant here to remember the often repeated statement
of the UNP leader during the Presidential campaign that should he win,
he would seek the support of the SLFP in a bid to resolve the ethnic
question.
It is now up to him to translate this words into deeds, for the
future of the country is at stake. This is no time for dithering or
petty politicking.
It is only as a united force that the country could face the
challenge before it. If the UNP keeps dodging its responsibilities on
the pretext of some excuse it would some day have to give an account to
the people which voted for the party and its leader. |