Religious tolerance and national
cohesion
Most readers of this newspaper are
likely to readily agree that it was a most inspiring sight to
see the Mahanayake of the Asgiriya Chapter, the Most Ven.
Udugama Sri Buddharakkitha Thera, presenting a memento to the
visiting Archbishop of Canterbury, Rev. Dr. Rowan Williams. The
picture spoke more eloquently than words on the religious
tolerance and amity which continues to characterize Sri Lanka.
From time immemorial this heartening tradition of religious
accommodation and harmony has been alive in this country,
testifying to the broadness of vision of the majority of Sri
Lankans. The hospitality and warmness of heart extended to the
visiting Archbishop by our senior Buddhist Prelates is a most
striking pointer to the inter-religious amity which is the happy
lot of Sri Lanka.
As is well known, Buddhism preaches religious harmony and
equality. It does not advocate religious intolerance and hatred
which are the products of callow, unrefined and sadistic minds.
In fact, religious intolerance goes hand-in-hand with
hegemonistic tendencies of all other kinds and is basically
fascistic in nature. We Sri Lankans could take joy in the fact
that we are not heirs to such a damning political heritage.
We are blessed with a democratic system of government which
has lasted well over 50 years and the political culture that
goes along with this structure of governance has bequeathed to
us a priceless gift in the form of religious accommodation and
tolerance, of which Lankans could be collectively proud.
It is up to Sri Lankans to perpetuate this priceless legacy
which ensures social peace. In this context, the political
leadership of the country plays a critical role. If the
political leadership says ‘no’ to religious chauvinism and does
everything in its power to wipe it out, this form of intolerance
and hatred would quickly die out.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa did just this no sooner he
assumed office. He was clear and explicit that under his
administration, every woman, man and child would enjoy absolute
freedom of conscience and religion, which is an inalienable,
fundamental right.
This unambiguous policy position saw an end to some religious
tensions which were struggling to emerge. If political leaders
persist with this laudable policy, religious tensions would
never emerge in the land. By saying a clear ‘no’ to the
politicization of religion, a country could continue to breathe
the refreshing air of religious harmony.
Therefore, Archbishop Williams’ current visit could be
considered a high-water mark in the history of interreligious
relations of Sri Lanka. It proves, once again, that religious
accommodation and harmony is not only alive and well in Sri
Lanka but flowering luxuriantly.
These healthy traditions should be vibrantly perpetuated. The
tolerance evinced in respect of religion needs to be extended
continuously to all other areas of national life - race,
language, cultural traditions etc.
It is not the case that intolerance has surfaced in these
areas but Sri Lankans need to continuously work towards erasing
ill-feelings of any kind which may impinge on national cohesion. |