Another blow to Tigers
It is fairly well known that all
terror groups have seemingly legitimate front organisations that
help raise funds for their survival. These organisations
continue to operate even if the mother outfit itself is banned
in a given country.
The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) are no exception.
The LTTE operates a vast business empire that includes a number
of front organisations handling so-called humanitarian, cultural
and social work primarily in the uncleared areas of Sri Lanka.
In reality, their main aim is channelling funds to the LTTE
for clandestine weapons purchases, cadre training, propaganda
and operational expenses. The intended recipients - the
civilians - rarely see the colour of such monies.
The LTTE recently received a severe blow when the assets and
funds of its main front organisation the Tamils Rehabilitation
Organisation (TRO) were frozen by the US Government after
extensive investigations revealed the extent to which the LTTE
had misused the funds for its own benefit.
The UK too had de-listed the TRO as a charity organisation.
Now Sri Lanka itself has proscribed the TRO, which received a
huge quantum of funds following the tsunami disaster in 2004.
Following the US decision, Sri Lanka had already appealed to
the 15 countries that have TRO offices and international
organisations and INGOs that deal with the TRO directly or
indirectly to take action against this organisation and to cease
any transactions.
The proscription of the TRO in Sri Lanka will augment Lanka’s
case against the TRO and the LTTE. A freeze on TRO funds was
already effective.
An appeal will also be made from them to review the
operations and its relationships with other LTTE front
organisations such as White Pigeon.
This will really be a victory for the Tamil people here and
abroad who forced to pay monthly sums to LTTE front
organisations. Human rights groups have documented how the LTTE
engages in extortion for fund raising, often going to the extent
of threatening the lives of relatives of unwilling donors.
One of the most effective ways of crushing terror groups is
stopping their flow of funds. The LTTE will now find it
difficult to raise funds abroad and channel them here through
formal and informal channels.
This will impact severely on the LTTE fund raising and arms
procurement network, which has already suffered several major
setbacks.
In fact, the main purpose of fund raising is arms procurement
and any impediment to raising funds directly affects the group’s
weapons purchases. The Navy’s recent successes whereby nearly 10
LTTE weapons ships were destroyed have also added to the LTTE’s
woes.
The emerging laws on money laundering and terrorist financing
will be a blow to all terror groups who use illegitimate
channels to transfer money to their secret coffers.
Having perceived the global reach of terrorist organisations,
more countries are working together, sharing intelligence and
information to nip their heinous designs in the bud. Such
cooperation is essential to save the world from acts of
terrorism and carnage.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s appeal to the Food and
Agricultural Organisation (FAO) to consider a Global Fund for
Aquaculture is most timely, given the importance of the
fisheries industry to many countries including Sri Lanka.
The main thrust of his argument was that this would help the
fisheries industry in developing countries to be sustainable,
competitive and responsible.
In fact, developed countries have to take the blame for
depleting fish stocks in the open ocean, as their massive
trawlers equipped with advanced fish-finding sonar are no match
for even the multi-day boats operated by fishermen in developing
countries.
Sri Lanka will soon inherit a massive ocean area many times
bigger than its existing area. Nevertheless, we have not been
able to successfully exploit the marine resources even in that
limited area. It is indeed pathetic that Sri Lanka has to depend
on canned fish imports while a vast ocean teeming with fish
stocks surrounds it.
The modernisation of the fisheries industry will help Sri
Lanka to reduce its dependency on imported fish and provide
consumers with fresh fish at more affordable prices.
The development of the inland fisheries industry must also be
given priority. The ban effected on inland fisheries by a
previous administration was a major setback to the industry,
which took several years to recover afterwards.
The Daily News recently featured how inland fish farmers in
Padaviya, North Central Province, were doing a roaring business
with traders coming from all parts of Sri Lanka to buy their
catch. We hope that more inland waterways and tanks would be
used for aquaculture in a similar manner.
With experts predicting a food crisis in the not-so-distant
future, the sustainable management of ocean resources worldwide
is essential to feed a growing population. Sri Lanka’s proposal
should be considered in earnest in this context. |