A future in history
Rumina Sethi reviews Michael Ondaatje’s new novel
Divisadero which unweaves the unseen connections running through people
and continents
SEVEN YEARS AFTER ‘Anil’s Ghost’ appears ‘Divisadero’ which is the
name of a street in San Francisco that symbolises the geographical split
that takes the tale from California to France. Literally, it means
“division” in Spanish.
It could also mean “divisar”, that is, “to gaze at something from a
distance” which is appropriate to the opening of the novel that shows
Claire gazing down at the arson and violence in the Glen Ellen Bar.
Taking the history of the entire 20th century as its backdrop, with
all its joys and sorrows, we become aware of a distant war that
portentously casts its shadow on the novel.
Hidden presences
Ondaatje locates the family of Anna, Claire and their father assisted
by Coop, a farm hand, in the 1970s small town of Petaluma in California.
And then, owing to the discovery of the affair between Anna and Coop,
the world of this family stands brutally shattered. Anna moves to the
south of France and begins her research on the Gallic author Lucien
Segura.

Claire moves to San Francisco working for a lawyer while Coop runs
away to become a gambler in Reno. Across time and space, the various
characters impinge on each others’ history. Despite the divisions,
‘Divisadero’ is thus about the intertwining of characters from different
backgrounds as well as the geographical intermingling of minds and
continents.
As Ondaatje poignantly puts it: there is the “hidden presence of
others in us, even those we have known briefly”. This is Ondaatje’s way
of unweaving an unseen connection between people moving across the
globe, a world of displacement and belonging. It is the terrain that
becomes the objective correlative of an inner upheaval and
discontentment, of unshakable past and its imposition on the present.
Distinct style
Undeniably, the novel is a feat in poetic prose, taking the reader
back 1849 and the gold rush. The ambience of various junctures in
history is vividly recreated, but with discreet gaps here and there to
be filled by the reader’s own creativity. For instance, when Marie-Neige
reads ‘The Three Musketeers’ to the blinded Lucien, he wants to know
some detail that he has missed.
When she volunteers to go back, he retorts: “No, just go on Not
knowing something essential makes you more involved.” This fits in with
Ondaatje’s notion of fiction which rejects linearity.
The ever moving scenario of the gold rush reflects in the itinerant
character who remains an alien to her location, torn between two worlds,
one that she belongs to, another that she quests to inhabit, but sees
nothing but betrayal and violence at the heart of human life.
Indeed, attention to detail is minute and vivid such as when Ondaatje
is describing the relationship between the daughters and their father:
“I would watch the flicker under his eyelid, the tremble within that
covering skin that signalled his tiredness, as if he were being tugged
in mid-river by a rope to some other place. And then I too would sleep,
descending into the layer that was closest to him.”
Each character has a depth and lives on vibrantly in the readers’
mind even when Ondaatje moves away from the chief characters in the last
section into a world of other peripheral characters.
Thus the three sections of the novel resound with the reference to “a
three-panelled Japanese screen, each one self-sufficient, but revealing
different qualities or tones when placed beside the others.” Geographies
of the mind.
Moving from a rural setting in California to the groggy air of Nevada
casinos to France, the novel is an intimate account of a splintered
family like the dominant image of shards of glass that runs through the
novel.
It is a multifaceted novel, a geography of the mind, peculiar in its
structure yet gripping in its hold, yielding more if one is ready to
surrender oneself completely to its symphony of seductive prose and
vibrantly complex characters. |