A timely plea
The request made by Fisheries
Minister Felix Perera to the Catholic Bishops to help in the
current initiatives to bring the Sacred Madhu Statue into a
Government controlled area it is hoped would elicit a positive
response, considering the growing concern by the Catholic
community as to the fate of the miraculous statue.
The Minister who represents a predominantly Roman Catholic
constituency and himself a staunch Catholic has moved the Church
to restore the statue of Our Lady of Madhu to a location where
devotees from all over the country could congregate which is not
the case at present where the statue had been placed in a church
in an area under the domination of the LTTE.
The Church we hope would heed this request so that devotees
from the South who form the majority of the pilgrims to Madhu
would not be deprived of the opportunity of at least a glimpse
of the miraculous statue away from its hallowed jungle shrine.
We are not sure if the custodians of the statue at present
would have a say in this regard. If the LTTE prohibits the
statue being moved from its temporary location that would only
expose its beastly conduct to the outside world.
The Government would have an the ideal opportunity to show
the international community how the LTTE would even deny
religious worship to ordinary civilians and is capable of even
holding a venerated statue as a bargaining chip.
The Government we feel should lobby the Vatican to move in
the matter for it has a duty by the Catholic community to ensure
that the statue is restored in its rightful place. Of course a
cautious approach will be needed given the sensitive nature of
the problem.
The Catholic Bishops on their part should wield all influence
at their command to resolve the matter in a way that would not
endanger the statue.
There will be those among the catholic community who will
want the statue to be placed at the original shrine given the
history and legend associated with the location.
The only way to achieve this is to get the LTTE vacate the
sacred precincts and regard the sanctuary as a No-Fire Zone.
The Army Amnesty
The Government has once again
granted an amnesty to Army deserters to return to their billets
with the customary pledge of not taking action against them.
According to Military Spokesman Brigadier Udaya Nanayakkara the
amnesty will be in force from May 2 to 6 and there would no
extension beyond this date.
The problem of Army deserters has been a recurring phenomenon
during the country's long drawn out war and in the present
context fraught with danger given that many of the violent
robberies and hold ups in the country have been attributed to
deserters who usually decamp with their weapons.
Military statistics show there are about 15,000 soldiers who
deserted the Army and during the last amnesty period in November
2007, 4,000 had returned to their battalions.
With the Army on a recruitment drive it would be useful if
the current amnesty period is extended so as to accommodate a
large number of returners.
Certainly the number of Army deserters was alarmingly high
earlier and it would be prudent for the military authorities to
ascertain the reasons for soldiers to decamp.
There may be several reasons for this. No doubt the lengthy
exposure to battle and the prolonged rigours, hardships and the
exacting demands of a soldier may have forced these men to
desert.
However, it has now been revealed that there has been a
remarkable drop in desertions during the Army's highly
successful military drive. On the other hand, there have been
more desertions during the periods when the Army suffered
setbacks. This trend is also seen in recruitment - more youths
are lining up to join the Army and other Forces now than at any
other time.
However, it would prudent to ascertain if our fighting men
are properly phased out on the battlefront and given proper
respite during lengthy operations.
The long drawn out nature of the battles may also be taking a
heavy toll on some of these soldiers who may be not equipped
like there fellow colleagues who are made of sterner stuff to
endure the hard grind and exacting demands of a soldier.
It is therefore important that standards are raised for
recruitment and the overall capacity of such recruits to hold
out are assessed and taken into consideration.
There is also a need for close scrutiny and proper evaluation
of soldiers on the battle field and proper counselling made
available to overcome the tensions and rigours of battle. True,
desertions were there even when ours was a ceremonial Army. But
steps are needed to remove the stigma of desertions. Welcoming
them back is one way of achieving that goal. |