
Lankan sports blessed with the initials 'SJ'
Sri Lanka sports has been blessed with the initials 'SJ' which stands
for two of the greatest sporting heroes of our times, be it locally or
internationally. One 'SJ' belongs to the cricketing arena while the
other underlined her supremacy as a sprint queen.
The first 'SJ' we have been talking about is none other than our
master blaster, Sanath Jayasuriya, who was adjudged the Most Valuable
Player of the tournament in Sri Lanka's 1996 World Cup triumph.
The other 'SJ', who brought sporting glory to Sri Lanka is none other
than Susanthika Jayasinghe, who won Sri Lanka an Olympic medal after 52
years.
True that both these sporting heroes are ageing and have reached the
final bend in their careers. I see a lot in common in these two star
sporting Sri Lankan heroes.
Apart from sharing the same initials which stands for their first
names and surnames - SJ. Both their surnames start with 'Jaya' which
means victory in Sinhala.
They have lived up to that Sinhala meaning at all levels, brining
many victories for Sri Lanka. They have been sporting ambassadors who
have kept the Lion flag fluttering high in the international arena.
Both Jayasuriya (Matara) and Jayasinghe (Warakapola) are rural
products who had humble beginnings with immense hardships.
But they overcame all odds to reach the top. Their achievements are
hard to beat, or even emulate. Becoming Player of a World Cup tournament
or scoring a marathon 340 runs in a Test match are no easy tasks. That
makes Jayasuriya one of the best ever cricketers in World cricket.
Similarly, Jayasinghe is the only Lankan woman to win an Olympic
medal and only the second from our country after the late Duncan White
who won a silver way back in 1948.
It was Jayasinghe who broke that 52-year-old hoodoo in Sydney 2000
Games. Moreover, Jayasinghe is the only Sri Lankan to win a medal in the
IAAF World Championship history. She achieved this rare honour twice -
in 1997 Athens (silver) and in 2007 Osaka (bronze).
Though the duo have many other sporting achievements to their credit,
the few feats mentioned above alone make them special sporting
personalities.
Talking about what is common in them, most importantly, the criticism
they have faced over the years. Though there are millions of supporters
to cheer when Jayasuriya is batting or when Jayasinghe does her
blistering run on track, they have to face equal volume of criticism
when they fail.
That too is understandable as expectations of our sports fans are
high whenever Jayasuriya walks out to the middle to bat or Jayasinghe
comes under the starter's orders. But what baffles me is the
unreasonable and bias criticism both Jayasuriya and Jayasinghe have been
forced to face from time to time.
There have been many organised media campaigns against Jayasuriya and
Jayasinghe. I would agree with one point those critics highlight - that
they are aging and old. Yet, they still have not lost their old touch
and Sri Lanka still depends on them as we have not found replacements
who could come anywhere near their feats.
Hence, though the so-called critics continue to attack the duo, they
themselves, along with the majority of sports fans, still depend on
Jayasuriya and Jayasinghe to deliver. More importantly, both of them
still look and have not lost their rhythm, despite the fact that they
are in their 30s.
Last week at the Wankhede Stadium, Jayasuriya proved that age has
nothing to do with his batting capabilities with another majestic knock.
He was at his brilliant best, making a power-packed unbeaten century in
the Indian Premier League.
Scoring a Twenty20 century in a highly competitive tournament which
has attracted the cream of international cricketers, is no easy task.
But when Jayasuriya is in full cry, there is nobody who could challenge
or equal his willow power.
It looked like as though Jayasuriya was reborn as 102 off his
unbeaten knock of 114 runs came in boundaries. It was an innings
reminiscent of the mid-90s, a time when Jayasuriya filled bowlers with a
sense of fear, especially during the 1996 World Cup. Incidentally, it
was the same ground on which Jayasuriya hammered an unforgettable 151
not out in the Independence Cup in 1997.
But when Jayasuriya was making his willow to do the talking, our
selectors dropped a bombshell by dropping the master blaster from next
month's Asia Cup tournament. But their immediately rectified the
blunder.
Though media reports said Jayasuriya was brought back on the
instructions of Minister Gamini Lokuge, the Sports Minister has denied
that.
But there is noting wrong even if Minister Lokuge interferes with the
selections when there is a gross injustice.
He has all the right to consult the necessary people and arrive at
the most appropriate decision before inking the final line-up. It is
unfortunate that some critics continue to attack Jayasuriya in an
organised manner.
It was reported that selector Don Anurasiri was not in favour of
including Jayasuriya. Though the majority were in favour of playing
Jayasuriya, unconfirmed reports said Anurasiri and captain Mahela
Jayawardene had other ideas, stating that they are looking for a team
that could be groomed for the next World Cup tournament in 2011.
There is truth in what they are saying. But that does not mean we
should bury a player like Jayasuriya who is still good.
If the national selection policy was purely for giving youngsters an
opportunity and purely on merit, Don Anurasiri would not have got so
much of opportunities during his time with his moderate spin bowling.
In 18 Tests, he had captured only 41 wickets with an unimpressive
average of 37.75 with his slow left-arm orthodox bowling.
It was still worse in ODIs, where he had only 32 scalps in 45 games
averaging 45.75. Having grabbed so much of opportunities without any big
achievements, it looks morally wrong for Anurasiri to adopt such a
policy to Jayasuriya who is still performing well.
Similarly, when almost everybody thought sprinter Jayasinghe's days
were over, she once again emerged victorious during her lead up to the
Beijing Olympic Games. |