A timely directive
The assurance given by President Mahinda Rajapaksa
that no more will he allow State property to be sold no doubt
would be welcomed by the public at large particularly following
the recent unravelling of the shady transactions involving State
land and public assets.
The Presidential edict it is hoped would put an end once and
for all to the flagrant misuse of public property that has
proved to be cancer eating into the body politic of the country.
It is no less a person than the Chief Justice who went to the
extent of invoking the wrath of the gods on those who disposed
of public assets for a song. This in itself shows the extent of
emotions and feeling generated at the misuse of public property
of all strata from the humble to the mighty.
This springs from the basis that public property has been
entrusted to the powers that be to be held in trust for the
public. But over the years as the recent Supreme Court verdict
has demonstrated our leaders have betrayed this sacred trust and
instead made use of sate property to enrich themselves. It is in
this context that the President’s directive should be hailed as
a path breaking development.
Addressing workers of the State Insurance Corporation who
were granted appointment letters, at Temple Tress on Friday, the
President said that under no circumstances would State property
be sold, adding “future generations should be able to enjoy the
benefits of these assets as we enjoy them today as a result of
the great sacrifices of the patriotic leaders of this nation”.
No doubt the President’s concern may have been prompted by
the evident large scale abuse and plunder of State assets by
those who should have known better resulting in the public being
denied the fruits of these valuable property and assets. For
instance, the allocation of a storm water retention land for the
building of a hotel and golf course far from benefiting the
public have caused them to suffer when their homes and property
go under floods due to such injudicious acts.
Leaders of the immediate post independent Governments
exercised great propriety in matters of public property and
State assets and any deviation from the laid down procedure and
guidelines evoked a huge public outcry with trade unions in the
forefront holding the Government accountable for any wrongdoing.
These assets involved not only State land. Public
institutions and corporations were jealously protected by the
workers in the immediate post independence era and particularly
after the 1956 revolution which saw the vesting of all sterling
Companies with the State.
That was the time when most utility services such as Ports
and Transport came under State control and the public was
infused with a state of pride and belonging that they were at
last made partners and stakeholders in the affairs of the State
after centuries of foreign rule.
True, not all these State ventures became successes, some of
them later turned out to be white elephants. But this was
chiefly due to mismanagement brought about by political meddling
rather than any inherent weakness in their running. In fact most
of these State ventures were deliberately run to the ground with
the advent of the open economy so that they could be sold out to
the cronies of the powers that be.
Public property became easy game for politicians bent on
making hay in a culture which bred crooks and wheeler dealers
who brokered the sale of State assets. That was a time when
State owned land changed hands for a song and politicians took
maximum advantage of a free wheeling consumerist ethos.
The most notorious case that comes to mind is the swapping of
fallow unproductive land of a Government Minister for several
acres of fertile State land. There were other instances where
State land went for as low as Rs.32 an acre. All these lands of
course were subsequently returned following exposure by the
Special Presidential Commission when the Government changed.
President Rajapaksa’s decision to put a halt to all sale of
State property, while obviating the need for such time wasting
Commissions in the future at public expense, would also serve to
retain public assets for the sole benefit of the public
particularly the future generation. This rip off has to end and
President Rajapaksa has taken a timely decision.
There is also an urgent need to save State land particularly
at a time the Government has embarked on an ambitious food
production drive and when land is at a premium.
There is also the need to ensure that all liberated land in
the North and the East would be prudently used for the benefit
of the people in the region and that no room is left for
misappropriation of State property and assets in those areas. In
this context the message spelled out by President Rajapaksa will
serve to drive the point home to all concerned that public
property is not to be trifled with.
|