|
Today is the World Town Planning Day:
Planned regional approach required in Lanka
Prof. Ashley LS Perera
The World Town Planning Day (WTPD) is celebrated globally on November
8, each year. The objective of the celebrations is to focus on the
contribution of town and country planning to community development and
the improvement of the quality of life of the people.
The WTPD was initially mooted by Professor Carlos Maria della Paolera
of the University of Buenos Aires in the 1940s with a view to attract
public and professional interest both locally and internationally to the
art and science of town and country planning and its positive impact on
the development of conducive human settlements. WTPD has since been
observed in many countries all over the world for several decades. It
has been observed in Sri Lanka for many years as well on the initiative
of the writer of this paper.
Despite the efforts undertaken locally to attract attention on the
work of town planners and their achievements in facilitating habitable
human settlements
|
The discipline
of town and country planning is primarily geared to the
provision of a conducive human settlements environment. It had
its origin in the Public Health Acts of the second half of the
19th century Britain. The Industrial Revolution in England led
to an urbanisation process and the growth of large factory towns
which occurred at a time when planning and building regulations
were non-existent. |
development for well over 25 years, there is still some
confusion among some sections as regards the meaning and scope of town
planning. A recent news item that appeared in one of the dailies on
October 13, 2008 suggests that some are even unaware that town planning
is one of the leading professions with a distinct identity. In terms of
this news item the Chamber of Commerce has apparently taken a decision
to employ architects instead of engineers for town planning work. The
Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce in his confused state of mind has
even suggested that planning needs suitable architects and the task of
the engineer is to construct buildings. I am sure that the architects,
engineers and town planners would have been equally amused by the
ignorance of this individual. On the other hand it is indeed a pity that
neither the Institute of Town Planners Sri Lanka nor the Department of
Town Planning of the University of Moratuwa took the initiative to
clarify the position, for the benefit of the public. It has also been
observed that some news papers display a reluctance to carry articles on
the subject of town planning despite its wide socio-economic
implications on society and relevance for the upgrading and improving of
the quality of life of the community as a whole.
The discipline of town and country planning is primarily geared to
the provision of a conducive human settlements environment. It had its
origin in the Public Health Acts of the second half of the nineteenth
century Britain. The Industrial Revolution in England led to an
urbanisation process and the growth of large factory towns which
occurred at a time when planning and building regulations were
non-existent. Consequently thousands of dwellings were run up without
adequate sanitary provision. These dwellings had no supply of water;
they were ill-ventilated and dirty. There was no system of drainage with
only ill-constructed cesspools. House refuse was not collected and
destroyed but merely deposited in gutters or on waste ground at odd
corners. These factors not only added to the horrors of town life but
also gave rise to disease and death. The relevance of the above arises
from the fact that most of the expressed concerns were later to become
the subject matter of town and country planning. It also provided a case
for the State intervention in the provision of urban services and
introduction of legislation to compel private parties to adhere to such
legislation and comply with minimum standards.
The Housing and Town Improvement Ordinance was thus one of the first
pieces of legislation to be introduced to provide for better housing for
the people and the improvement of towns. While the Housing and Town
Improvement Ordinance introduced in Sri Lanka in 1915 was meant to
improve housing and towns primarily through development control measures
the Town and Country Planning Ordinance was introduced for making of
schemes with respect to the planning and development of land in Sri
Lanka, and to provide for the protection of buildings and other objects
of interest or beauty. A third Statute to be introduced was the Urban
Development Authority Law of 1978. Its objectives were to promote
integrated planning and implementation of the economic, social and
physical development of urban areas.
The background of these statutes and the objectives outlined therein
clearly illustrate the nature of the art and science of town and country
planning and its professional practice. While many professions may be
capable of providing both personalized as well as service to the
community as a whole, the town planning profession could cater to the
latter more effectively. The conducive human settlement environment that
the town planners aim to achieve is a totality which is inseparable and
designed for the common benefit of the community as a whole. Town
planners could advise the public about the rationale of land uses and
the meaning and purpose of planning and building regulations and help
them to arrive at rational decisions. Town planning as most other
professions affects the day to day life of the people. Community
participation, community involvement, public hearings are well
recognised means of identifying the aspirations of the people. The main
characteristic of town and country planning is that it is both
multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary. It is one profession that
cannot be practiced without inter-professional collaboration. Like in
other fields those who aspire to be planning professionals should engage
in relevant studies for at least five years of which at least two years
should be on multi-disciplinary studies.
In recent times some efforts were made to introduce the concept of
community participation in local planning in some selected local
authorities. This was done with the active participation of the
community which met with some degree of success. A planning process was
designed by this writer which helped to increase and intensify the
interaction between the local authorities and the different
stakeholders. All members comprising the local community, community
organizations, women's groups, the private sector, dormant and
marginalized sections of the community, religious organizations etc, got
an opportunity to identify their development priorities and service
needs which were included in the development plan. There was however, a
snag. The facilitators of the planning process were not qualified
planners. The sustainability of this effort was therefore in grave doubt
because of the wrong assumption of the organisers that planners could be
trained with a five day instruction course in planning.
Town Planning has been practised in this country for well over fifty
years. It received an added impetus in the 1970s when development plans
were prepared for almost all Municipal and Urban councils in the country
under the purview of the Urban Development Authority. Despite these
efforts most towns in Sri Lanka continue to face major urban problems.
Solid waste management is one such problem of crisis proportions.
Practically all towns in Sri Lanka are straddled with this problem.
While the volume of solid waste generated could be some what reduced
through a community participatory approach it is apparent that the
problem cannot be solved at each local authority level. It requires a
planned regional approach with an appropriate regional strategy. Some of
the other vexed problems haunting local authorities comprise
unauthorised structures in the city and town centres; squatter
settlements abetting public roads, railways and public open space;
traffic congestion and increasing volume of road accidents. Many reasons
can be attributed to the chaos in our towns and cities. However the
fundamental cause seems to be the pervasive socio-economic and political
environment entailing undue political interferences and weak enforcement
of laws and regulations related to the environment, development,
planning and building.
The writer is the former Head of the Department of Town and
Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Director of Post Graduate
Studies and Senior Professor of Town and Country Planning |