Lankans play themselves out
The
semi-finalists of the ICC Champions Trophy tournament in South Africa
have been found with the completion of the last two league round
matches.
It was a sad story for Sri Lanka, which started the eight-nation
'Mini Word Cup' with a bang - beating much fancied hosts South Africa in
the 'curtain raiser' game. But what originally looked relatively easy
games for Sri Lanka - against England and New Zealand, ultimately turned
out to be nightmares for Kumar Sangakkara and his men.
One wonders whether the Lankans became overconfident after that
memorable win over South Africa and underestimated their opponents in
the next two games.
Even that slim and last hope Sri Lanka had of a place in the semi
finals was shattered after England's batting collapse in Tuesday's
league match against New Zealand. Though England came to the last league
match on a high note, winning their first two games against South Africa
and Sri Lanka, they were made to eat humble pie by the determined Kiwis.
Batting first, England were bowled out for 146. Though New Zealand
prevented England registering their third successive win, the Kiwis
could not prevent England advancing to the semi finals to be played on
Friday and Saturday at Centurion and Johannesburg respectively.
If England won their last league match against New Zealand, Sri Lanka
would have had a chance of making it to the last four on a superior net
run rate.
But with that easy win the Kiwis earned on Tuesday, they would
advance to the semi finals along with England, leaving South Africa and
Sri Lanka out from group 'B'.
Pakistan made an early booking in the 'semis' after two early wins.
West Indies played some poor cricket and paid the penalty to be out of
the 'semis'.
Sri Lanka team could only blame themselves for failing to make use of
the early advantage they have had. Beating a superior team such as South
Africans by 55 runs in their own den was a creditable achievement. But
the Lankans lacked consistency and surrendered meekly to two relatively
weak opponents.
Losing both their dashing openers Sanath Jayasuriya and Tillakaratne
Dilshan within the first 15 balls after being put in to bat cost Sri
Lanka their second game against England. Sri Lanka never recovered from
early shocks after being reduced to 61 for 5 in the 20th over. England
too started their run-chase disastrously, losing both their openers with
only 19 runs on the board in the eighth over.
But that didn't bother England as they were chasing a modest target
of only 213 runs.
Sri Lanka cut a sorry figure in the last game against New Zealand.
Though skipper Kumar Sangakkara vowed to bounce back, the Kiwis taught
Sri Lanka and unforgettable lesson. Sri Lanka's decision to field first
after winning the toss on a good batting track was highly questionable.
Under the circumstances, New Zealand proved Sangakkara's decision wrong
as Brendon Macullam and Jesse Ryder put on 125 runs for the first wicket
in exactly 20 overs.
Sri Lanka's bowling was in total disarray and the only bright spot
was that sensational spell of 3 for 39 off 10 overs by veteran Sanath
Jayasuriya. Sri Lanka's quick bowlers suffered a severe beating from New
Zealand batsmen who made merry against the bowling of Nuwan Kulasekera,
Thilina Thushara and Lasith Malinga.
After all, experience too matters when playing under those conditions
in South Africa. If a seasoned campaigner such as Chaminda Vaas had been
there, he would have used his head and combined it with his vast
experience. Unfortunately, young Kulasekera, Thushara and Malinga could
hardy do anything.
Though Kulasekera compensated with the bat, scoring his maiden one
day international half century, Sri Lanka fell short by 38 runs. New
Zealand's commanding total of 315 for 7 always looked a winning total
and the Lankan batsmen had to pay for the sins of their bowlers.
Losing to India in the Compaq Cup final and the poor performance at
the ICC Champions trophy in South Africa indicate that Sri Lanka has lot
more to learn, if they are to regain their lost prestige.
Despite their fluent performances in the established game, Sri Lanka
has fared poorly in the limited versions of the game. In late 90s, it
was the other way around as the Lankans were strong in ODIs after the
1996 World Cup triumph, yet faring poorly in Tests.
Prior to the Compaq Cup debacle, Sri Lanka suffered back to back
defeats in the two-match Twenty20 series against New Zealand. Sri Lanka
is yet to register their maiden Twenty20 home victory.
It seems that Sri Lanka is over dependent on Jayasuriya, Dilshan,
Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara. Fortunately, Thilan Samaraweera
and Thilina Kandamby have shown some aggression.
Even the display shown by bowler turned batsman Nuwan Kulasekera is a
welcome sign. With a little more concentration and training, Kulasekera
could strengthen lower order batting. Vaas used to play a similar dual
role in the past and if Kulasekera could make some contribution with the
bat, it is definitely going to be a bonus.
What matters is to use the plus points for the benefit of the team
and make it a habit of winning. Sri Lanka has a talented side but they
have failed to be consistent when it comes to winning.
ICC Champions trophy is now history for Lankan team. But it taught us
many useful lessons. We must make a study as to what went wrong, how and
why that happened. The team will have to do a lot of home work before
preparing for the next international assignments.
If Sri Lanka could tighten those lose ends and play as a team, they
have the ability to beat any team in the world. What matters is to
rectify our shortcomings and make winning a habit.
|