Sri Lanka, a country with immense potential, has been grappling with numerous socio-economic challenges for decades. Among these, the persistent disorder caused by trade unions and student activism has become a critical issue that demands urgent attention. As the country strives to achieve sustainable development, it is necessary to examine whether it can progress when these movements run amok. Last week alone saw work stoppage and strike action by several trade unions. These movements, once advocates for workers’ rights and students’ welfare, have now become excessively politicized, often driven by hidden agendas that hinder national progress.
Trade unions and student activism have deep roots in Sri Lanka’s socio-political landscape. Trade unions emerged during the British colonial period, primarily to protect the rights of workers who were subjected to exploitative conditions. The Ceylon Labour Union, founded by A.E. Goonesinha in the early 20th century, was one of the pioneering movements that sought to improve the livelihoods of workers. Similarly, student activism gained momentum in the 1960s and 1970s, with student unions playing a crucial role in advocating for educational reforms and opposing oppressive government policies.
However, over the years, these movements have strayed from their stated origins. The political landscape in Sri Lanka has always been tumultuous, and trade unions and student groups have not been immune to its influence. The genuine causes of these organizations have been overshadowed by political agendas, leading to a significant shift in their objectives and methods.
Politicisation and Hidden Agendas
The politicisation of trade unions and student activism in Sri Lanka is a glaring issue. Many unions are now affiliated with political parties, and their actions often align with the interests of these parties rather than the genuine needs of their members. This has led to a situation where strikes and protests are orchestrated not for the betterment of workers or students, but to further political objectives.
One of the most striking examples of this is the ongoing non-academic strike in universities. Non-academic staff, who play a crucial role in the functioning of higher education institutions, have been on strike for some time over a number of demands. While their grievances may demand attention, the prolonged nature of the strike and the timing of their demands suggest a political undercurrent. This strike has severely disrupted academic activities, affecting thousands of students and jeopardizing their future.
Similarly, student unions in universities have been vehemently opposing higher education sector reforms. These unions argue that opening up the higher education sector to private universities would lead to the commercialisation of education and marginalise students from lower-income families. While there is some merit to this argument, the obstinate opposition to any form of reform indicates a reluctance to embrace change and an adherence to outdated ideologies. This resistance to reform is often fueled by political entities that have vested interests in maintaining the status quo.
The education and healthcare sectors in Sri Lanka have been particularly affected by the actions of trade unions. Frequent strikes by teachers, non-academic staff, and healthcare workers have disrupted the delivery of these services, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and suffering among the public.
In the education sector, strikes and protests have resulted in the closure of schools and universities, delaying examinations and causing academic calendars to go awry. This has had a detrimental impact on students, who are left in a state of uncertainty and anxiety. The quality of education has also suffered, as continuous disruptions prevent teachers from completing the curriculum and providing adequate support to students.
The healthcare sector has not been spared either. Strikes by healthcare workers, including doctors and nurses, have led to the suspension of medical services, putting patients’ lives at risk. These actions often cause chaos in hospitals and clinics and underscore the urgent need for a more balanced approach to addressing workers’ grievances without compromising public welfare.
Adding to the complexity of the issue are allegations of corrupt practices by union leaders. There have been numerous reports of union leaders living lavish lifestyles, far removed from the struggles of the workers they claim to represent. These leaders often enjoy perks and privileges that are incongruent with their purported commitment to workers’ rights. This disparity between their rhetoric and reality raises serious questions about the integrity and motivations of these leaders.
The misuse of union funds, lack of transparency in financial dealings, and the opulent lifestyles of some union leaders have eroded public trust in these organizations. Instead of being seen as champions of the working class, unions are increasingly perceived as vehicles for personal enrichment and political maneuvering.
The Need for Fresh Thinking
In light of these challenges, it is evident that Sri Lanka needs fresh thinking in the realms of trade unions and student activism. The country cannot afford to be held back by the neanderthal mindsets that resist change and prioritise political gains over national progress. There must be a concerted effort to depoliticise these movements and restore their focus on genuine advocacy for workers’ and students’ rights.
Firstly, there is a need for greater accountability and transparency within trade unions. Mechanisms should be put in place to ensure that union leaders are held accountable for their actions and that union funds are managed responsibly. This would help rebuild trust in these organisations and ensure that they genuinely represent the interests of their members.
Secondly, there must be a willingness to embrace reforms, particularly in the education sector. The opposition to private universities and higher education reforms is rooted in a fear of change and an adherence to outdated ideologies. It is crucial to recognise that private universities can complement public institutions and provide more opportunities for students. A balanced approach that ensures equitable access to education while embracing the benefits of private sector involvement is essential.
Also, the government must engage in constructive dialogue with trade unions and student groups. Rather than resorting to confrontational tactics, there should be an emphasis on negotiation and collaboration. This would help address the legitimate concerns of workers and students while ensuring that their actions do not disrupt the functioning of essential services.
Sri Lanka stands at a critical juncture in its journey towards progress and development. The actions of trade unions and student activists, driven by political motivations and hidden agendas, have become significant obstacles to this progress. The education and healthcare sectors, in particular, have borne the brunt of these disruptions, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and suffering.
To move forward, there must be a paradigm shift in how trade unions and student activism are perceived and managed. By embracing transparency, accountability, and a willingness to reform, Sri Lanka can harness the potential of these movements to drive positive change rather than hinder progress. Only then can the country truly achieve the sustainable development it aspires to.
The stakes are high, and the time for change is now. Sri Lanka cannot afford to let the actions of a few derail the aspirations of many. The future of the nation depends on the ability to navigate these challenges with wisdom, courage, and a steadfast commitment to progress. By fostering a culture of accountability and embracing necessary reforms, Sri Lanka can pave the way for a brighter, more prosperous future for all its citizens.
Ashoka Siriwardena
